see the project report here

Transkript

CONVENTION ON WETLANDS (Ramsar, Iran, 1971)
Rue Mauverney 28, CH-1196 Gland, Switzerland
Tel. +41-22-999-0170, Fax +41-22-999-0169
E-mail: [email protected], Web: http://ramsar.org/
Wetlands for the Future Fund (WFF)
Section E
Standard format for the preparation of Final Reports
(To be filled in by the implementing agency/organization/proponent)
Country: Turkey
Title of the Project: Effective Management of Ramsar Sites in Turkey
Project code: 7501-400/SGF/08/TU
Year of approval: 2008
Project Officer (see Section 5 below for further details): Can Yeniyurt
Date project was completed: March 2010
Date final report provided: August 2010
Have you provided the Final Report in electronic as well as hard copy format?
Have you enclosed?
a) Some suitable photographs or color slides (with the necessary description) illustrating
the project? Yes
b) the copies of the materials produced with WFF funding (if applicable)?
No
1. Abstract
The project started to be implemented by April 2009. The initial action undertaken for the
project was to explore the existing wetland management structures in Turkey. Meetings were held
with NGOs and Government institutions to generate ideas for the best wetland management
structure based in the previous experiences in Turkey. Following the outputs of these meetings
were discussed with the Ministry of Environment and Forestry but also with the key decisionmakers and diverse stakeholders in the Kızılırmak Delta. As a result, all parties agreed that it
would be beneficial to identify a different additional management structure than the Local
Wetland Commission. The responsibility of the Local Wetlands Commission covers all the
wetlands within a province and only includes members at provincial level but the setting up of
technical commission for a specific area including members from land users such as farmer etc.
will support the successful implementation of the wetland management plan. Successively, we
directed our activities to support the establishment of a Technical Commission for the Kızılırmak
Delta by the Local Wetlands Commission. Our first activity with the Kızılırmak Delta Technical
Commission was to organise a field visit to the Gediz Delta. The aim of the visit was to create a
ground for experience sharing between the two deltas. The technical commission was especially
asked to evaluate the Gediz Delta Union model and learn about their experiences but also to
explore the similarities about the management process of the Gediz Delta. During the fieldtrip
several different stakeholder meetings were also organised for experience sharing.
In accordance with our second project objective, the preparation of a guidebook about the
Ramsar Sites in Turkey has been initiated. Initially it was planned to prepare a simple booklet
about the Ramsar Sites in Turkey but after a series of consultation with the Ministry it has been
decided that it would be a book that would give more details about the areas. This decision leads
the project team to spend more time on the preparation, design and translation of the book. The
book is expected to be finalised and published by late September – Early October 2010. The
content of the book describes the values, issues, management planning process for each Ramsar
Sites in Turkey.
Under the 3rd objective of the project a fieldwork was carried out in two intervals to eight Ramsar
Sites that are in the process of implementing their management plans. The first trip was made
with the collaboration of Serhan Çağırankaya from the Ministry of Environment and Forestry,
Melike Hemmami, Water Policy Coordinator of Doğa Derneği and Can Yeniyurt, Project Officer
and Key Biodiversity Areas (KBA) Officer of Doğa Derneği. The first trip included Burdur Lake,
Gediz Delta, Manyas Lake and Uluabat Lake. The second trip was made with the collaboration of
Serhan Çağırankaya from the Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Esther Koopmanschap,
Centre for Development Innovation also Ramsar CEPA Board Member, Melike Hemmami,
Water Policy Coordinator of Doğa Derneği and Can Yeniyurt, Project Officer and Key
Biodiversity Areas (KBA) Officer of Doğa Derneği. The second fieldtrip included Sultan
Marshes, Yumurtalık Lagoons and the Göksu Delta. An additional trip was made by the Project
Officer Can Yeniyurt to the Kızılırmak Delta. During both fieldtrip interviews were carried out
with the Directorate of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry officers responsible for the
implementation of the management plan in their area. Additionally, when possible other
institutions and stakeholders were also consulted.
Finally, the outputs of the interviews were shared in a meeting held in Samsun with all the
Management Plans responsible staff members of the Provincial Directorates of the Ministry of
Environment of all the Ramsar Sites in Turkey. The relevant NGOs representatives were also
present in the workshop. The workshop was a success by ensuring the participation of 56
persons from different areas in Turkey. The workshop outputs were also included in the Ramsar
Sites Management Plan evaluation report.
2. Achievements against each project objective
In a separate page for each objective of the project, as stated in the project proposal, please indicate
the output(s) in terms of:
a) Task completed or b) Task only partially completed or c) Task not attempted and in addition,
in the same page, please provide a summary of action(s) taken for each output.
Objective 1. To increase public participation in management of Turkey's Ramsar Sites at local level – Kızılırmak
Delta Ramsar Site model case
a) Task Completed
Output 1: Legal Kızılırmak Delta Ramsar Site Local Management System
Following the kick-off meeting of the project in April 2009, in order to identify the appropriate
local management structure for Kızılırmak Delta the Project Officer initiated a research, meetings
and interviews with relevant stakeholders in the area of Wetlands Management Planning. In order
to reach this aim, the first action undertaken was to evaluate the existing management structures
in the Ramsar Sites with management plan in Turkey.
Uluabat Lake
Gediz Delta
Burdur Lake
Yumurtalık Lagoons
Kızılırmak Delta
Manyas Lake
Sultan Marshes
Göksu Delta
An Uluabat lake Management Plan Steering Committee is set up
under Bursa Local Wetland Commission. The meeting of this
committee is constituted by local authorities and NGOs based
in the region
The implementation of the Gediz Delta Management Plan is
undertaken by Izmir Bird Paradise Conservation and
Development Union in coordination with the Provincial
Directorate of MoEF. The finance of the Union is generated
through the municipalities of the area which spare 1000/1 of
their annual budget for the union.
No specific body has been set up for the Management of the
Burdur Lake. The decisions are made through the Burdur Local
Wetlands Commission and the secretariat is undertaken by the
Provincial Directorate of MoEF.
A Steering Committee under the Adana Local Wetlands
Commission is responsible of the implementation of the
Yumurtalik Lagoons Management Plan which can set up a
technical commission formed by expert wherever it might be
needed. The Members of this commission are the staff of the
Governorship, Municipalities of the area, Village Mukhtars
(elected headman of the village), Water Products Kooperatives,
Hunting club members.
No specific Management Structure other than the Provincial
Directorate of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry before
this project.
Directorate of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry –
However, the existence of a National Park Facility by the site
create a different opportunity in terms of Communication and
the Control of the site
Directorate of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry
EPASA and Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of
Environment and Forestry
After the compilation of information related to different management structure these were
evaluated together with the Wetlands Division of the MoEF and several NGOs (WWF Turkey,
Bird Research Society - KAD) experienced in the area of Wetlands Management Planning in
Turkey. The discussions were focused on the advantages and disadvantages of the existing
structure and on how could this be developed further for better success in the implementation of
Wetland Management Plans in Turkey (Activity 1.1). The outputs of these meetings and
consultation process were then shared with relevant stakeholders in the Kızılırmak Delta such as
the decision makers (Governorship of Samsun, Special Province Administration, Provincial
Directorate of Environment and Forestry, Provincial Directorate of the Agriculture, State
Hydraulic Works, Administrative District of Bafra, Administrative District of Ondokuzmayis
District), but also stakeholders like Ondokuzmayis Hunting Club, Bafra Hunting Club,
Municipality of Doganca, Municipality of Yorukler, headmen of the villages around the site.
Furthermore, additional meetings were held at the Provincial Directorate of Environment and
Forestry with the above-mentioned stakeholders for further discussions and the development of
the best management structure idea for the Kızılırmak Delta (Activity 1.2). As a result of this
consultation process the Local Wetlands Commission of Samsun Province decided to establish a
Technical Commission for the Kızılırmak Delta in order to support the implementation of the
Kızılırmak Delta Management Plan. The reason under the need of establishing such a technical
commission was fed by the need of having a closer link with primary stakeholders in the area.
The technical commission would also enable the land users to participate to the decision taking
processes about the site and also would support the site to be managed together with the
stakeholders. The members of the technical commission were;
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
The Head of the Administrative District of Bafra
The Head of the Administrative District of Alaçam
The Head of the Administrative District of Ondokuzmayıs
The Faculty of Agriculture of Ondokuzmayıs University
The Faculty of Science of Ondokuzmayıs University
Provincial Directorate of State Hydraulic Works (DSI)
Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs
Provincial Commission for the Protection of Cultural and Natural Heritage
Samsun Nature Protection Association
The Municipality of Doğanca
The Municipality of Yörükler
Provincial Chamber of Agriculture
Yörükler Water Products Cooperative
Ondokuz Mayıs Hunting Club
Bafra Hunting Club
Special Provincial Administration
The difference of this Commission compared to the Samsun Local Wetland Commission is the
participation of the last 7 Members in the list above. The Commission meets at regular intervals
(once in two months) and coordinates the implementation of management plan of the Delta.
The next step undertaken in this project was to organise a study tour to the Gediz Delta together
with 4 members (Governorship of Samsun, Municipality of Doganca, Provincial Directorate of
Agriculture, Provincial Directorate of Environment and Forestry) of the newly set up technical
commission. The aim of the visit was to create a ground for experience sharing among both sites.
During three days, many meetings were held with different stakeholders of the Gediz Delta
region. The Kızılırmak Delta Technical Commission members were especially impressed of the
structure of the Union and how it was possible to generate finance through the Municipalities.
Another impressive point was the coordination among the different stakeholders of the Delta by
organising monthly meetings with all the parties involved in the management plan of the site.
Many discussions were also made on the common problems face in both sites, these discussion
raised the importance to foreseen some problems that might generate in the Kızılırmak Delta in
the future. The fact of Gediz Delta being close to a big city like Izmir creates a lot of threats for
the site. The technical commission realised the importance of taking preventive steps in order not
to face the same problems in the Kızılırmak delta in the future. The visit also raised awareness on
how to make use of the bird diversity as an added value for the region. This aspect of the Gediz
Delta was thought of a good development to be used in the Kizilirmak Delta in order to create
an opportunity to attract tourist to the site and making use of it as an income generating
opportunity and the advantage of how the presence of a centre supports the attraction to the site.
The period where the study tour was done the relations between the Provincial Directorate of
MoEF and the Union was in very good terms also involving closely the NGOs of the region
which was also a point that was valued by the Kızılırmak Delta Technical Commission. Another
beneficial aspect of the visit was to see how one of the Technical Commission members had a
change of attitude according what he saw in the Gediz Delta. It was the second visit of the
Doganca Municipality Chief, the first time he visited the site, he had met a farmer dealing with
husbandry complaining how it was no longer possible to do husbandry in the area because of the
protected area status. However, this visit allowed the mayor to see how the problems related to
husbandry were solved with dialogue. This information had an important impact on boosting
certain prejudice on nature conservation activities (Activity 1.3). The agenda of the study visit
can be found as attachment 2 and the participants list as attachment 3.
In order to develop the Terms of Reference of the Kızılırmak Delta Technical Commission a
meeting was organised before the Gediz Delta study visit in order to evaluate the existing
different structure. This meeting resulted with the decision of accepting the implementation of
the Kızılırmak Delta Management Plan as the main responsibility of the Technical Commission.
This decision remained the same after the study visit to the Gediz Delta. However, the
experience of the study visit was shared with the rest of the members as important points to take
into consideration during the implementation of the Kızılırmak Delta Management Plan. The
Study tour also underlined the importance of the role of the Provincial Directorate of MoEF as a
secretariat which should be facilitating the coordination of different stakeholders but also to
support the Technical Commission in their task (Activity 1.4). Finally, this activity had an impact
on increasing the communication level with the Technical Commission members and the
Provincial Directorate of MoEF. This communication process also created a basis on searching
together finance opportunities like the Special Provincial Directorate of Administration of
Samsun offering their opportunities to write proposals for the implementation of the Kızılırmak
Delta Management Plan.
The Kızılırmak Delta Technical Commission gathered 6 times from June 2009 - March 2010. The
initial meetings were mainly to discuss the implementation and monitoring of the Kızılırmak
Delta Management Plan. The first steps were to have presentations on what was so far
implemented by different stakeholders. This also created an opportunity to share information
among different stakeholders. The evaluation of this activities made by the Technical
Commission were then presented to the Samsun Local Wetlands Commission (activity 1.5). The
first decision taken with all the stakeholders after the end of the project was on agreeing on the
construction of an interception channel planned under the Bafra plain left bank irrigation project.
Objectives 2: To promote Ramsar sites’ values and public participation approaches in their management planning
to central and local key stakeholders
Task Partially Completed
A small booklet was initially prepared last year in July including brief information on Ramsar Sites
in Turkey. However, after many discussions with the Ministry of Environment and Forestry,
Wetlands Division it has been decided that it would be more appropriate and useful to increase
the content of the booklet in order allow more space to share the management planning process.
This change requires more time for the preparation of the booklet and couldn’t be finalised so
far. The book is expected to be published by Late September 2010 – Early October 2010. The
content of the book will be as follow;
• Description of Wetlands
•
The importance of Wetlands Ecosystems
•
The Ramsar Convention and Turkey
•
Ramsar Sites of Turkey
•
Sultan Marshes, Kuş Lake (Manyas), Seyfe Lake, Göksu Delta, Burdur Lake, Kızılırmak
Delta, Uluabat Lake, Gediz Delta, Akyatan Lagoon, Yumurtalik Lagoons, Kızören
Obruğu, Meke Maarı, Kuyucuk Lake.
Each site will include a brief site definition, information on the management structure and it’s
past. Up to this point, the areas which the contents are finalised are sent to the Ministry of
Environment and Forestry, Wetlands Division for their approval and immediately sent for
translation in English. The poster will also be prepared in the same period as according the
discussions held with the Ministry it would be more appropriate to design a poster coherent with
the booklet. Once both materials are published it will be shared with all the relevant stakeholders
in the Ramsar Sites in Turkey but also different Ministries at Central Level.
Objectives 3. To share Ramsar site management planning expertise throughout Turkey.
Task Completed
The activity has been initiated by making a research on different tools used for Management Plan
Evaluation in order to develop/adapt a methodology for the assessment of the implemented
Ramsar Site Management Plans in Turkey. Accordingly a quick assessment form including open
ended questions were prepared for the fieldtrip (details on the methodologies are included in the
fieldwork report). Eight Ramsar Sites were visited during this fieldwork with different experts as
mentioned in the abstract of this report. Those areas were the Göksu Delta, Kus Lake (Manyas),
Uluabat Lake, Gediz Delta, Kızılırmak Delta, Sultan Marshes, Yumurtalık Lagoons and the
Burdur Lake. In each area, the Provincial Directorate of Ministry of Environment and Forestry
responsible departments were visited and discussions about the implementation of Ramsar Sites
Wetlands Management Plans were discussed. However, during the discussion the management
plan development processes were also discussed (Activity 3.1).
The fieldwork report including the meeting outcomes is about to be finalised and will soon be
shared with relevant stakeholders. The English version of the report will also be sent to the
Ramsar Secretariat once completed. The main issues in terms of implementing the Wetlands
Management Plans that we encountered in most of the sites were the lack of knowledge on the
wetland management planning process, the participation concept perceived in different levels and
lack of capacity on biodiversity monitoring. Another issue often mentioned was the lack of
financial resources and the frequent changes occurring in the Government staff resulting of new
persons being responsible of the management plans implementation process without having a
clear idea on the preparation process (Activity 3.2).
Following an experience sharing workshop of two days has been organised in Samsun. The date
of the workshop has been selected to also take the opportunity to celebrate the World Wetlands
Days. All the Ramsar Site responsible government officers and several NGOs and University
members working in different Ramsar Sites in Turkey were present in the meeting. For more
information, the programme and the participants list is annexed to this report (Activity 3.3). The
beginning of the meeting was mainly focused on the celebration of the World Wetlands Day
where the Director of the Nature Conservation Department of the Ministry of Environment and
Forestry, Mr. Ali Mennan Mennanoğulları honoured the meeting with an opening speech
underlining the importance of wetlands ecosystem also by their services to the local communities
in terms of economical benefits. Mr. Mennanoğulları also raised the importance of protecting the
wetlands with regards the possible future water shortage threats. The director of the Provincial
Directorate of the MoEF, Mr. Ömer Albayrak in his speech especially pointed out the
importance of the Kızılırmak Delta as a Ramsar Site and the necessity of being able to protect the
site for future generations. Finally, the Vice-Governor of Samsun, Ramazan Aksoy honoured the
morning session with a speech on the importance of wetlands and his experience related the
Sultan Marshes, the place where he originally comes from. The opening speeches were followed
by various presentations on Ramsar Convention related activities in Turkey. The representative
of the Ramsar secretariat Nadezhda Alexeeva presented a presentation on Wetland Management
Planning and links with the Ramsar Convention. The afternoon session was allocated for group
working on discussions about the main topics that emerged from the fieldtrip interviews. The
participants divided on different topics such as monitoring, legislation, participation, finance and
land use pressure to discuss the common problems of different sites followed by discussion on
the possible solutions and finally the necessary management structure to address these issues. The
outputs of the meeting have been integrated within the Ramsar Site Management Plans
Implementation report (Activity 3.4). The programme and participants list of the meeting is
annexed to this report.
The second day of the meeting was allocated to a field visit in the Kızılırmak Delta where the
participants from different Ramsar Sites were able to see the Kızılırmak Delta but also the
facilities of the National Parks that newly has been constructed to undertake activities targeting
the visitors.
3. Overall project outcomes
Overall, has the project achieved what it set out to do? Yes
If No, please indicate the reasons for failing to meet the overall objective.
Please provide information about two or three lessons learned in the implementation of the
Project.
It would have been beneficial to have invited the managers of the Gediz Delta to the Kızılırmak
Delta in order to have more members of the technical commission benefiting from their
management experience
The workshop organised in Samsun showed the importance of bringing together the managers
of different Ramsar Sites to enable them to share their experiences but also discuss their
common problems which could need a more collective approach to find solutions.
4. Recommendations for future follow-up and conclusions
The Wetlands Management Plans in Turkey are often prepared by NGOs, Companies and in
some cases by Government Officers from the Central Level. The time limit for the development
of a plan is maximum 3 years. However, the implementation of the plan is left to the Provincial
Directorate of MoEF. The feedback received during the field interviews shows that the parties
have serious difficulties to implement and understand the logic of the management planning
process and accordingly faces difficulties to coordinate the implementation. Once a management
plan is developed for a site it is vital to ensure 2-3 years support to the site in terms management
planning logic and tools that would contribute to its successful implementation.
The lack of sufficient staff in the local directorates has important impacts for monitoring
activities. The project showed once again the importance of developing upper level strategy that
could impact the National Policies to allocate sufficient staff to undertake monitoring activity.
The main reasons of the problems encountered in the Ramsar Sites of Turkey are caused by
wrong irrigation techniques used in Agricultural lands and the pollution created by these lands. It
is vital to develop ideas/projects in order to solve these problems.
Most of the Management Plans in Turkey are not easily implemented because of the lack of
financial resources. The development of projects to implement certain activities existing in the
management plan could be a good opportunity to support the implementation of the
management plans.
Many projects were implemented in Turkey in order to raise awareness and increase capacity on
participatory approaches in the development process of wetlands management plans. The
evaluation of different management plans in the course of time does show important
improvements in terms of the increase of attempts to develop plans in a more participatory way.
However, the perception on the level of participation is still not sufficient for the successful
implementation of the plans as it was not possible to see a general ownership feeling of the plan
by different stakeholders in most of the sites. Supporting activities that improve participation
comes out as an important point for the future.
5. Budgetary details
Please submit a detailed expenditure and income account referring to the original Project budget. Indicate
expenditure and income in the currency(s) in which they have actually occurred, and as necessary
provide the exchange rate into Swiss Francs to be applied. Please attach a separate finance report
table (preferably in Excel or Word) which presents all the expenditures in the categories of the
original budget, as well as a summary table with the totals by category.
Were all funds allocated to the project from the WFF spent in accordance with the project
specifications and approved budget? Yes
The detailed Budget Report is provided as Attachment - 6
6. Project Officer (person responsible for executing the project)
Name: Can Yeniyurt
Institution: Doga Dernegi
Address: Hürriyet Cad. 43/12 Dikmen / Ankara / Turkey 06460
Signature:
Date:
7. General Director of Doga Dernegi
Name: Bahtiyar Kurt
Institution: Doga Dernegi
Address: Hürriyet Cad. 43/12 Dikmen / Ankara / Turkey 06460
Signature:
Date:
8. Approved by the Ramsar Administrative Authority
Name: Yaşar Dostbil
Signature:
Administrative Authority: General Directorate of Nature Conservation and National Parks
Ministry of Environment and Forestry
Date:
Address: Söğütözü Cad. No: 14 / E Kat: 14 / Ankara /Turkey 06560
Attachment -1 Summary Project
Turkey has declared 12 Ramsar Sites since 1994 upon ratification of Ramsar convention with a
total surface area of 179.773 ha. In 2002 “The Regulation on The Conservation of Wetlands” was
entered in the force (and revised in 2005) by The Ministry of Environment and Forestry. Up to
now, the Management Plans of 6 Ramsar sites was entered in to force, nowadays for 2 Ramsar
Sites Management Plans are prepared. Additionally, in 2003 National Wetland Strategy (20032008) was accepted and is being implemented.
It has been experienced that in Turkey implementation of management plans need a local
management system for effective management and monitoring of these sites. There is a need to
encourage establishment of local management systems in all Ramsar sites and other wetlands for
wise use of wetlands. Ramsar sites, their values and participatory systems in management are not
well-known enough by key stakeholders. There is a need to publish and widely distribute
informational materials on Turkey’s Ramsar sites and their values. Since 1994, Turkey has been
party to the Ramsar Convention, local and central ministerial experts gained experience in
management planning and monitoring of wetlands. For wise use of wetlands in Turkey, there is a
need to share this experience throughout Turkey through a meeting and report.
This project’s aim objective is to enhance effective conservation of Turkey's Ramsar sites. This
project proposal addresses these specific objectives in Ramsar Strategic Plan 2003-2008
operational objectives:
1. To increase public participation in management of Turkey's Ramsar Sites at local level Kızılırmak Delta Ramsar Site model case (Operational Objective 11 through enhancing
establishment of local management systems in Ramsar sites as cross-sectoral management
committees)
2. To promote Ramsar sites’ values and public participation approaches in their management
planning to central and local key stakeholders (Operational Objective 6 through well known
values of Ramsar sites by related stakeholders)
3. To share Ramsar site management planning expertise throughout Turkey Operational
Objective 14 through experience share in management planning and monitoring of Turkey’s
Ramsar sites)
First specific objective will be implemented in Kızılırmak Delta Ramsar site, which is one of the
most important delta ecosystems in Black Sea coast. Management plan of this site has been
finalized in 2007 with Ministry of Environment and Forestry and Doga Dernegi’s close
cooperation. Kızılırmak Delta local management system will be the main responsible body for
effective implementation and monitoring of this management plan for many years. DD will
continue to play its main role in Kızılırmak Delta management plan activities and assist local
management system members. The Ramsar site booklets and posters will be used by many
stakeholders to inform their members for many years.
Turkey’s Ramsar site management planning lessons learnt report will be the main resource for
current management planning activities in Turkey. As the NGO member of the National
Wetland Commission in Turkey, DD will follow up the results of the project and use and lobby
for its results for the wise use of wetlands in Turkey.
Attachment - 2
Under Objective 3: Sharing Ramsar site management planning expertise and information in Turkey’s
experience with other wetlands in Turkey
Gediz Delta Experience Sharing Visit
Dates: 22nd, 23rd and 24th of July 2009
22nd of July, 2009 – Arrival to Izmir
23rd July 2009
09.00 – 09.15 Opening speech
09.15 – 09.30 Project presentation, Doga Dernegi
09.30 – 10.00 Gediz Delta presentation, Doga Dernegi
10.00 – 11.00 Gediz Delta Management Plan, Izmir Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of
Environment and Forestry Office
11.00 – 11.15 Coffee break
11.15 – 12.15 Management Plan Implementation Process, Protection and Development Union of
Izmir Bird Paradise
12.30–14.00 Lunch
14.00–15.30 Gediz Delta Field trip
24 July 2009 - Departure
Attachment -3 Participation List of the Gediz Delta Experience Sharing Visit
Date
: 23 July 2009
Location : Đzmir, Gediz Delta
Name
Foundation
Phone
E-mail
Ali Aydın
Đzmir Provincial Directorate
+905323635133
[email protected]
of the Ministry of
Durmuş Yıldız
Samsun Provincial Directorate +903622313700
[email protected]
of the Ministry of Agriculture
and Rural Affairs
Fatih Bulut
Samsun Provincial Directorate +905388591566
[email protected]
of Environment and Forestry
Đsmail Mutlu
The Municipality of Doğanca
+905323714837
[email protected]
Nilsun Ege
+902323696485
[email protected]
Polat
of the Ministry of
+905374257895
[email protected]
+905326322202
[email protected]
+905325046430
[email protected]
Ömer
Izmir Bird Paradise
Döndüren
Conservation and
Development Union
Selin Koptu
of the Ministry of
Sema Arıman
Samsun Province Special
Provincial Administration
Attachment -4 Programme of the “National Ramsar Site Management Experience
Sharing” Meeting
World Wetlands Day
" National Ramsar Site Management Experience Sharing Meeting "
2-3 February 2010
2 February 2010 / Tuesday
Samsun / Ondokuzmayıs University Tepe Hotel
Time Content
Speakers
09:00 Registration
Ramazan AKSOY, Governorship of Samsun
Ali Mennan MENNANOĞULLARI,
9:30
Opening Speeches
Ömer ALBAYRAK , Provincial Directorate of
Melike HEMMAMĐ, Doğa Derneği
“Voice of the Wetlands” Video
10:00 Show
Activities related to the Ramsar
10:15 Convention in Turkey
Effective Management of Ramsar
10:40 Sites in Turkey Project
11:00 Coffee Break
Serhan ÇAĞIRANKAYA, Ministry of
Melike HEMMAMĐ, Doğa Derneği
Nadezhda ALEXEEVA, Ramsar Convention
The Ramsar Convention and
11:30 Wetlands Management Planning
12:00 Kızılırmak Delta
12:30 Lunch
National Ramsar Site Management
13:30 Experience Sharing Question &
Answer
15:00 Coffee Break
Secretariat
Ömer ALBAYRAK, Provincial Directorate of
Group work
National Ramsar Site Management
15:30 Experience Sharing Question &
Answer
Group work
18:00 Closure
19:00 Dinner
3 February 2010 / Wednesday - Samsun / Kızılırmak Delta
09:00
12:00
13:30
17:00
Departure
Lunch
Kızılırmak Delta Field Visit
Arrival
Attachment -5 Participants Lists of the “National Ramsar Site Management Experience
Sharing” Meeting
No Name
Foundation
1
Abdullah Sevinç
Provincial Directorate of Environment and Forestry
2
Ahmet Aydın
Yörükler Water Products Cooperative
3
Ahmet Ulusoy
Bafra Hunting Club
4
Ali Mennan Mennanoğulları
5
Alpay Tırıl
Sinop University
6
Evrim Sönmez
Interpreter
7
Ayhan Arıkan
Kırşehir Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of
8
Ayhan Boyacı
The Head of the Administrative District of Bafra
9
Berrin Tanrınur
Samsun Provincial Directorate of Environment and
Forestry
10
Can Yeniyurt
Doğa Derneği
11
Deniz Güler
Egedoğa Association
12
Durmuş Yıldız
13
Elif Okumuş
Samsun Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of
Agriculture and Rural Affairs
Wetlands Division, Ministry of Environment and
Forestry
14
Ergin Öztürk
The Faculty of Agriculture of Ondokuzmayıs University
Ersan Berberoğlu
Burdur Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of
16
Fatih Bulut
Forestry
17
Ferrah Çakır
Balıkesir Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of
18
Fikret Coşuner
Forestry
19
Galena Đş
World Wildlife Fund (WWF-Turkey)
20
Gökhan Hacıömeroğlu
Samsun Provincial Directorate of State Hydraulic Works
15
21
Gülsüm Mumcu
22
Hakan Arslan
Hayri Öztürk
24
Hidayet Topçu
Bursa Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of
25
Đhan Cin
Samsun Provincial Directorate of the Agriculture
26
Đlker Özbahar
Turkish Bird Research Society
27
Đsa Eroğlu
S.S. Yörükler Agicultural Development Cooperative
23
The Head of the Administrative District of
Ondokuzmayıs
28
Kadir Ekinci
Kiraz Erciyas
Ornithological Research Center Ondokuz Mayis
University
Mazlume Mazlumoğlu
Adana Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of
31
Mehmet Şener
Konya Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of
32
Melike Hemmami
Doğa Derneği
33
Menderes Alan
34
Murat Demir
Samsun Provincial Commission for the Protection of
Cultural and Natural Heritage
Forestry
35
Murat Doğanay
Kars Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of
36
Murat Saraç
Mustafa Kurtulan
Mersin Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of
38
Muzaffer Çelik
Forestry
39
Nadezhda Alexeeva
Ramsar Convention Secretariat
29
30
37
Nagehan Acır
Adana Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of
Necat Đnce
Đzmir Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of
Nuran Yılmaz
Forestry
Ömer Albayrak
Forestry
44
Ömer Döndüren
Izmir Bird Paradise Conservation and Development
Union
45
Önder Cırık
Kuzeydoğa Association
46
Özden Sağlam
Samsun Nature Protection Association
47
Ramazan Aksoy
Governorship of Samsun
48
Savaş Yılmaz
49
Selman Çubukoğlu
50
Sema Arıman
Samsun Province Special Provincial Administration
51
Senem Üstün Kurnaz
Serhan Çağırankaya
Wetlands Division, Ministry of Environment and
Forestry
53
Süreyya Özdemir
Environmental Protection Agency for Special Areas,
54
Sezgin Üçüncü
The Head of the Administrative District of Alaçam
Şevket Ağmaz
Kayseri Provincial Directorate of the Ministry of
Yekta Özkan
40
41
42
43
52
55
56
Attachment -6 Finance Report
Doğa Derneği
Effective Management of Ramsar Sites in Turkey
02/04/2009 – 02/04/2010
DOCUMENT
HISTORY
DOCUMENT
NUMBER
EXPLANATION
TL
CHF
AMOUNT AMOUNT*
1. SALARIES / WAGES / CONSULTANCY COSTS
1.1 Supervisory Staff
30.04.2009
31.05.2009
30.06.2009
ÖZGE BALKIZ APRİL
ÖZGE BALKIZ MAY
ÖZGE BALKIZ JUNE
1.1 Supervisory Staff Total
2.814,95
2.918,28
2.992,45
2365,50
2452,34
2514,66
8725,68
7332,50
1.300,00
1092,44
1.2 Consultants / Experts
28.10.2009
84
NESLİHAN ÖZGÜNEŞ
1.2 Consultants / Experts Total
1300,00
1092,44
1.3 Office Staff
1.3 Office Staff Total
1. SALARIES / WAGES / CONSULTANCY COSTS TOTAL
0,00
0,00
10025,68 8424,94
2. TRAVEL & ACCOMMODATION COSTS
2.1 Air fares
26.06.2009
25.07.2009
25.07.2009
12.01.2010
14517
14609
14610
885524
ELİT TURİZM
ELİT TURİZM
ELİT TURİZM
ANADOLU JET
2.1 Air fares Total
183,00
129,00
129,00
59,00
153,78
108,40
108,40
49,58
500,00
420,17
2.2 Other travel costs
02.04.2009
02.04.2009
14.04.2009
18.04.2009
26.04.2009
28.04.2009
17.05.2009
17.05.2009
18.05.2009
14.07.2009
35580
227530
126157
337362
35580
44525
167570
166918
627317
352453291570
VARAN TURİZM
MEHMET KARAKAYA
TURGUT ÜLKER
VARAN TURİZM
MURAT TAMAR
AYHAN KOÇAL
HAVAŞ
HAVAŞ
EKREM TANCAN
ANADOLU JET
38,00
13,00
20,00
38,00
20,00
20,00
7,00
7,00
35,00
89,00
31,93
10,92
16,81
31,93
16,81
16,81
5,88
5,88
29,41
74,79
21.07.2009
22.07.2009
23.07.2009
24.07.2009
25.07.2009
25.07.2009
25.07.2009
02.08.2009
10.09.2009
26.10.2009
08.11.2009
08.11.2009
08.11.2009
09.11.2009
09.11.2009
11.11.2009
11.11.2009
13.11.2009
14.11.2009
14.11.2009
19.11.2009
05.01.2010
05.01.2010
05.01.2010
05.01.2010
08.01.2010
08.01.2010
10.01.2010
10.01.2010
10.01.2010
10.01.2010
10.01.2010
10.01.2010
11.01.2010
11.01.2010
11.01.2010
12.01.2010
12.01.2010
12.01.2010
12.01.2010
14.01.2010
14.01.2010
14.01.2010
15.01.2010
18.01.2010
171555
227791
59737
611855
14614
14613
14611
274574
418493
459875
679428
679429
169326
684151
2
535
9
12
35
7
67
718977
82317
817242
352129
968012
351733
752024
752025
752022
752023
303245
25334
269339
3
2
99251
97625
328685
16
5018
4027
28
20
72
EFENDİ EŞİYOK
HAVAŞ
VARAN TURİZM
AYŞE ŞAŞAL
ELİT TURİZM
ELİT TURİZM
ELİT TURİZM
KAMİL KOÇ TURİZM SEYAHAT
EMİR ABDULLAH GÖKDEMİR
HAVAŞ
KAMİL KOÇ
KAMİL KOÇ
SEMA SILBIYIK
KAMİL KOÇ
BAHTAŞ BURDUR AKARYAKIT
İZELMAN OTOPARK
ABAŞ PROJE İNŞ VE PETROL
ÖZDEMİRLER PETROL
BEĞENDİK
YAY PETROL TE.TİC.SAN.LTD
ŞEKER SHELL
HAVAŞ
HAVAŞ
ANADOLU JET
SÜLEYMAN KATAR
VARAN TURİZM SEYAHAT
RAMAZAN YÜKSEL
KAMİL KOÇ
KAMİL KOÇ
KAMİL KOÇ
KAMİL KOÇ
HARUN ÖCAL
YÜKSEL KALENDER
ALİ ŞENAY
BAHTAŞ
ŞEVKET ÖZMEN PET.NK.GD.
HAVAŞ
SÜHA ŞEHİRLERARASI OTOBÜS
AŞIR AKDENİZ
POYRAZ PETROL
K.G.M
K.G.M
TOROS TAR.SAN.TİC
TŞOF TRAFİK ARAÇ VE GEREÇ
ŞEKER SHELL
15,00
10,00
67,00
10,00
149,00
263,00
263,00
45,00
18,00
10,00
30,00
30,00
40,00
30,00
135,02
4,50
105,02
68,99
4,00
99,04
35,00
7,50
10,00
59,00
50,00
37,00
30,00
30,00
30,00
30,00
30,00
20,00
20,00
10,00
120,01
114,99
10,00
21,00
15,00
100,00
2,00
2,00
110,00
128,01
91,50
12,61
8,40
56,30
8,40
125,21
221,01
221,01
37,82
15,13
8,40
25,21
25,21
33,61
25,21
113,46
3,78
88,25
57,97
3,36
83,23
29,41
6,30
8,40
49,58
42,02
31,09
25,21
25,21
25,21
25,21
25,21
16,81
16,81
8,40
100,85
96,63
8,40
17,65
12,61
84,03
1,68
1,68
92,44
107,57
76,89
19.01.2010
19.01.2010
25.01.2010
25.01.2010
25.01.2010
31.01.2010
01.02.2010
01.02.2010
02.02.2010
02.02.2010
02.02.2010
02.02.2010
02.02.2010
02.02.2010
02.02.2010
03.02.2010
03.02.2010
03.02.2010
03.02.2010
03.02.2010
03.02.2010
03.02.2010
03.02.2010
03.02.2010
03.02.2010
03.02.2010
03.02.2010
04.02.2010
04.02.2010
15.02.2010
16.02.2010
20.03.2010
20.03.2010
21276
646218
410885
194470
992198
114421
171557
17434
31470
337306
337304
337305
558441
335114
190224
356501
27782
4183
128337
387243
387242
387241
4018
338509
338508
194216
370568
4334
244178
318384
130411
921556
339
FAİK ARSLAN
RECEP KANDEMİR
MEHMET ÖZTÜRK
ABDURAHMAN KATAR
HASAN SÖZCÜ
LÜKS ANI TUR
İSA ÇATALKAYA
DURAN YARIZ
ÖZKAYMAK
AHMET DEMİRTAŞ
AHMET DEMİRTAŞ
AHMET DEMİRTAŞ
BİROL TÜRK
AYHAN BÜLBÜL
ÖMER ARI
METRO TURİZM
METRO TURİZM
VARAN
KONSET
HAVAŞ
HAVAŞ
HAVAŞ
VARAN TURİZM
MURAT KOÇ
MURAT KOÇ
DURALI DEMİR
AHMET ERDEN
BEYŞEHİR SEYAHAT
İBRAHİM KOYUNCU
YENER ÇETİN
ARİF BARUĞ
ANADOLU DOĞA TURİZM
OSKA PETROL
2.2 Other travel costs Total
16,50
15,00
15,00
15,00
17,00
413,00
9,50
100,00
25,00
50,00
50,00
50,00
60,00
45,00
15,00
50,00
50,00
37,00
48,00
10,00
10,00
10,00
65,00
45,00
45,00
40,00
13,00
8,00
95,00
12,00
20,00
106,50
39,34
4396,42
13,87
12,61
12,61
12,61
14,29
347,06
7,98
84,03
21,01
42,02
42,02
42,02
50,42
37,82
12,61
42,02
42,02
31,09
40,34
8,40
8,40
8,40
54,62
37,82
37,82
33,61
10,92
6,72
79,83
10,08
16,81
89,50
33,06
3694,47
2.3 Accommodation
18.05.2009
23.07.2009
23.07.2009
11.11.2009
13.11.2009
14.11.2009
11.01.2010
160735
303577
303578
116376
45164
70872
79169
ANADOLU EVLERİ
İZMİR KARŞIYAKA ÖĞRETMENEVİ
İZMİR KARŞIYAKA ÖĞRETMENEVİ
TARIM VE KÖYİŞLERİ BAK.
KARACABEY ÖĞRETMENEVİ
İNEGÖL ÖĞRETMENEVİ
ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ TALAS
110,00
197,00
210,00
150,00
80,00
67,00
120,00
92,44
165,55
176,47
126,05
67,23
56,30
100,84
13.01.2010
15.01.2010
15.01.2010
20.03.2010
31.03.2010
19969
371565
15620
921557
921558
TAKAV
GÖKSU OTEL
ÖZTUR OTEL
2.3 Accommodation Total
140,00
150,00
90,00
74,49
3.800,00
5188,49
117,65
126,05
75,63
62,60
3193,28
4360,08
2.4 Meals
19.04.2009
20.04.2009
21.04.2009
21.04.2009
22.04.2009
23.04.2009
24.04.2009
25.04.2009
26.04.2009
29.04.2009
29.04.2009
22.07.2009
22.07.2009
22.07.2009
22.07.2009
22.07.2009
23.07.2009
23.07.2009
23.07.2009
23.07.2009
23.07.2009
23.07.2009
24.07.2009
03.09.2009
16.09.2009
16.09.2009
08.11.2009
09.11.2009
09.11.2009
10.11.2009
10.11.2009
11.11.2009
11.11.2009
11.11.2009
11.11.2009
11.11.2009
28
11
7319
7318
421
108
98
36
10
149
7
33
7
34
12
982834
200
201
17
196
140
61
6
150
4
26
11
14
164
128
677461
1
15
6
5
51
AKYÜZ
SAADET DÖNER
TATCAN KURUYEMİŞ
TATCAN KURUYEMİŞ
AKYÜZ
AKYÜZ
OMKAN İKT.İŞL.
AKYÜZ
ÇEŞNİ TURŞU
LİMAN BÜFE
TEYZENİN YERİ
KYAKA ÖĞRETMENEVİ
KADRİYE USLU
LEVTUR TUR.
AYDIN KARA
LOKAL GIDA
LOKAL GIDA
DEDE BİLİŞİM TURİZM
LOKAL GIDA
EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ
LOKANTA MEHMET NACİ
OSKA PETROL ÜRÜN İNS.TAAH.
PİDECİ
LİVA PASTANESİ
HAZAL GIDA TİC.LTD ŞTİ
ÖZSARI TOP VE PAR GIDA SAN.
MİGROS TİCARET A.Ş
BARINAK CAFE
ÖMER USTANIN YERİ
KAYA RESTORAN
ADEM USTA GIDA.PAZ.SAN
OSMAN ERŞEN ÇAY OCAĞI İŞL
OSMAN ERŞEN ÇAY OCAĞI İŞL
FOTOCAN GIDA İŞL
6,90
9,25
30,00
35,00
20,14
7,97
3,15
5,76
3,00
5,00
12,50
3,00
20,00
3,00
160,00
200,00
54,50
22,25
16,00
25,00
11,20
4,00
23,00
25,00
32,50
18,94
6,00
72,00
34,32
114,50
35,00
5,00
40,00
5,00
5,00
56,50
5,80
7,77
25,21
29,41
16,92
6,70
2,65
4,84
2,52
4,20
10,50
2,52
16,81
2,52
134,45
168,07
45,80
18,70
13,45
21,01
9,41
3,36
19,33
21,01
27,31
15,92
5,04
60,50
28,84
96,22
29,41
4,20
33,61
4,20
4,20
47,48
11.11.2009
12.11.2009
12.11.2009
12.11.2009
12.11.2009
13.11.2009
13.11.2009
14.11.2009
05.01.2010
05.01.2010
06.01.2010
06.01.2010
06.01.2010
06.01.2010
06.01.2010
06.01.2010
07.01.2010
08.01.2010
08.01.2010
08.01.2010
11.01.2010
11.01.2010
11.01.2010
11.01.2010
12.01.2010
12.01.2010
12.01.2010
12.01.2010
12.01.2010
12.01.2010
13.01.2010
13.01.2010
13.01.2010
13.01.2010
14.01.2010
14.01.2010
14.01.2010
14.01.2010
14.01.2010
14.01.2010
15.01.2010
31.03.2010
2.4 Meals Total
4
645
636
6
10
21
1
1
11
38
74
6
3
574
18
73
7
8
3
2
2
23
2
1
10
13
2
3
4
53
10
11
1
19
10
3
5
108
107
4
17
921559
KAYA RESTORAN
BEYAZ FIRIN GIDA MAĞZACILIK
BEYAZ FIRIN GIDA MAĞZACILIK
CANCAN MARKET
MEYDAN LOKANTASI
BESLER İNEGÖL KÖFTECİSİ
PEHLİVAN CAFE RESTORAN
MESUT DONDURMA
BURGER KİNG
HASAN TAYİNCİOĞLI
MADO
SEVGİ CAFE
ELİT UNLU GIDA
SİMİT CENTER
MADO
MADO
EYLENSEL RESTAURANT
PATRON CAFE CAY
YÖREM PİDE LAHMACUN
YÖREM PİDE LAHMACUN
ŞEVKET ÖZMEN PET.NK.GD.
KAŞIKLA MANTI RESTAURANT
KATE GIDA VE UNLU
S.S.TARIMSAL KALKINMA KOOP
HELVACI PETROL
ÖZTÜRKLER ET LOKANTASI
ÇAVDARLAR PETROL SAN.
METROL İKRAM PAZARLAMA
PAŞAM MARKET
PAŞAM MARKET
ZEYTİNALTI RESTAURANT
BABANIN YERİ
GÖZDE GIDA ÜRÜN İMALAT
GÖKSEL 1 GID.İLET.
TOROS TAR.SAN.TİC
TOROS TAR.SAN.TİC
EYLENSEL RESTAURANT
5,00
8,75
7,05
2,50
27,00
55,00
43,00
13,00
14,25
19,50
23,50
6,00
6,00
3,00
25,00
25,50
45,00
15,00
40,00
40,00
25,00
74,25
30,00
10,00
70,00
50,00
5,00
11,00
9,00
13,50
18,50
1,85
15,00
50,00
120,00
40,00
20,00
1,00
3,50
40,00
41,00
2.800,00
5003,03
4,20
7,35
5,92
2,10
22,69
46,22
36,13
10,92
11,97
16,39
19,75
5,04
5,04
2,52
21,01
21,43
37,82
12,61
33,61
33,61
21,01
62,39
25,21
8,40
58,82
42,02
4,20
9,24
7,56
11,34
15,55
1,55
12,61
42,02
100,84
33,61
16,81
0,84
2,94
33,61
34,45
2352,94
4204,23
2. TRAVEL & ACCOMMODATION COSTS
15087,94 12678,94
3. RAMSAR SECRETARIAT PROJECT VISIT: TRAVEL & ACCOMMODATION COSTS
3.1 Air fares
26.01.2010
110887
TÜRK HAVA YOLLARI
3.1 Air fares Total
143,00
120,17
143,00
120,17
3.2 Other travel costs
01.02.2010
01.02.2010
01.02.2010
03.02.2010
03.02.2010
04.02.2010
366567
366359
303257
337067
200527
8
HAVAŞ
HAVAŞ
HARUN ÖCAL
ALİ RIZA ÇAĞLAR
SAMİYE YAMAN
YETO YEŞİL ENERJİ TEKNOLOJİ
3.2 Other travel costs Total
10,00
10,00
15,00
10,00
16,00
56,54
117,54
8,40
8,40
12,61
8,40
13,45
47,51
98,77
3.3 Accommodation & meals
03.02.2010
04.02.2010
23630
17214
TEPE OTEL
ELİT PALAS
3.3 Accommodation & meals Total
3. RAMSAR SECRETARIAT PROJECT VISIT: TRAVEL & ACCOMMODATION
COSTS TOTAL
500,00
118,00
420,17
99,16
618,00
519,33
878,54
738,27
4. EQUIPMENT: PURCHASE, HIRE & RUNNING COSTS
4.1 Hiring vehicles
22.07.2009
06.10.2009
22.04.2009
17846
25
13
ZEPLİN TURİZM
FİLİZ OTOMOTİV
ŞEFEK PETROL
4.1 Hiring vehicles Total
450,00
25,00
25,04
378,15
21,01
21,04
500,04
420,20
20,00
100,04
190,03
16,81
84,07
159,69
4.2 Fuel & maintenance
10.04.2009
21.04.2009
22.07.2009
93
163777
7
4.2 Fuel & maintenance Total
CEM PETROL
UZUN PETROL
ÖLMEZ KARDEŞLER
310,07
260,56
4. EQUIPMENT: PURCHASE, HIRE & RUNNING COSTS TOTAL
810,11
680,76
5. OFFICE RUNNING COSTS (of DD Ankara central office)
5.1 Computer costs
0,00
0,00
5.1 Computer costs Total
0,00
0,00
5.2 Telephone & fax
30.04.2009
19.07.2009
07.08.2009
18.11.2009
24.03.2010
25.03.2010
28.04.2010
29
42
8
11
944606
23
816352
KEFELİ İNŞAAT
CANTEL İLET.
TEKİN İLETİŞİM
AS İLETİŞİM
TÜRK TELEKOM
CARREFOUR EXPRES
TÜRK TELEKOM
5.2 Telephone & fax Total
18,00
28,00
44,00
30,00
148,22
308,00
21,61
597,83
15,13
23,53
36,97
25,21
124,55
258,82
18,16
502,38
5.3 Photocopies
04.02.2010
22.03.2010
11190
11251
PASAJ KIRTASİYE
PASAL KIRTASİYE
5.3 Photocopies Total
162,25
315,00
477,25
136,34
264,71
401,05
5.4 Office supplies
19.04.2009
20.04.2009
20.04.2009
21.04.2009
22.04.2009
01.12.2009
31.03.2010
6
3
10
5
1
11064
11
YENİ ÇARŞI
YURTSEVER COLOR
YENİ ÇARŞI
YENİ ÇARŞI
BAHAR TİCARET
PASAJ KIRTASİYE
TEKNOSA İÇ VE DIŞ TİC.
5.4 Office supplies Total
6,00
6,00
10,00
3,00
2,00
256,06
59,90
5,04
5,04
8,40
2,52
1,68
215,18
50,34
342,96
288,20
0,00
1418,04
0,00
1191,63
5.5 Other (please specify): Office rent
5.5 Other (please specify): Office rent
5. OFFICE RUNNING COSTS (of DD Ankara central office) TOTAL
6. COST OF PUBLICATIONS, VIDEOS/DVDs, CDs etc.
6.1 Preparation
27.03.2010
81686
EMRE OFSET
6.1 Preparation Total
4.000,00
3361,34
4000,00
3361,34
8.000,40
6723,03
6.2 Printing / reproduction
27.03.2010
81687
EMRE OFSET
6.2 Printing / reproduction Total
8000,40
6723,03
6.3 Distribution (postage)
28.10.2009
11.03.2010
11.03.2010
17.03.2010
18.03.2010
18.03.2010
18.03.2010
24.03.2010
25.03.2010
26.03.2010
31.03.2010
31.03.2010
192024
817766
817752
845568
276685
276830
818108
1058050467
24793
818465
139308
461751
ARAS KARGO
ARAS KARGO
ARAS KARGO
YURTİÇİ KARGO
YURTİÇİ KARGO
YURTİÇİ KARGO
ARAS KARGO
PTT KARGO
YURTİÇİ KARGO
ARAS KARGO
PTT
PTT
6.3 Distribution (postage) Total
6. COST OF PUBLICATIONS, VIDEOS/DVDs, CDs etc.TOTAL
26,63
47,99
8,26
7,27
6,68
8,07
21,18
3,00
6,68
4,13
800,00
5,05
22,38
40,33
6,94
6,11
5,61
6,78
17,80
2,52
5,61
3,47
672,27
4,24
944,94
794,07
12945,34 10878,44
7. COST OF WORKSHOP(S)/ TRAINING COURSE(S)
7.1 Air fares
05.01.2010
21.01.2010
26.01.2010
26.01.2010
26.01.2010
26.01.2010
26.01.2010
817241
293085
610346
610345
610878
610880
610879
7.1 Air fares Total
7.2 Transportation
ANADOLU JET
PEGASUS HAVAYOLLARI
TÜRK HAVA YOLLARI
TÜRK HAVA YOLLARI
TÜRK HAVA YOLLARI
TÜRK HAVA YOLLARI
TÜRK HAVA YOLLARI
59,00
138,99
59,00
59,00
143,00
143,00
143,00
49,58
116,80
49,58
49,58
120,17
120,17
120,17
744,99
626,04
29.01.2010
30.01.2010
31.01.2010
31.01.2010
31.01.2010
31.01.2010
31.01.2010
01.02.2010
01.02.2010
01.02.2010
01.02.2010
01.02.2010
01.02.2010
01.02.2010
01.02.2010
01.02.2010
01.02.2010
01.02.2010
01.02.2010
01.02.2010
01.02.2010
01.02.2010
02.02.2010
02.02.2010
03.02.2010
03.02.2010
03.02.2010
03.02.2010
03.02.2010
03.02.2010
03.02.2010
03.02.2010
03.02.2010
03.02.2010
04.02.2010
06.02.2010
16.02.2010
643230
322845
142568
12727
12728
12729
142859
114702
544836
544835
23835
443443
146456
202469
250131
93958
273814
265576
104150
871952
923469
104127
230267
129805
3
132014
273816
280959
440281
871953
387270
26825
99880
26826
418090
26124
25
ŞANAL KIRŞEHİR
NİLÜFER TURİZM
NEVŞEHİRLİLER TURİZM
VARAN TURİZM
VARAN TURİZM
VARAN TURİZM
METRO TURİZM
DOĞA KARADENİZ
ULUSOY TİCARET TUR.
BAFRA AYDOĞAN TURİZM
LÜKS ARTVİN
HAVAŞ
METRO TURİZM
LİDER TURİZM
METRO TURİZM
HAS TURİZM SEYAHAT
METRO TURİZM
CİLBOĞLU ŞEKERLEME
HAVAŞ
METRO TURİZM
LİDER TURİZM
METRO TURİZM
KAMİL KOÇ
METRO TURİZM
ARGOLD KUY.TEL.
7.2 Transportation Total
13,00
35,00
35,00
37,00
37,00
37,00
50,00
25,00
37,00
37,00
50,00
45,00
8,00
55,00
50,00
60,00
41,00
41,00
30,00
50,00
55,00
30,00
38,00
60,00
50,00
50,00
37,00
51,00
31,00
43,00
10,00
50,00
30,00
40,00
40,00
40,00
31,00
1459,00
10,92
29,41
29,41
31,09
31,09
31,09
42,02
21,01
31,09
31,09
42,02
37,82
6,72
46,22
42,02
50,42
34,45
34,45
25,21
42,02
46,22
25,21
31,93
50,42
42,02
42,02
31,09
42,86
26,05
36,13
8,40
42,02
25,21
33,61
33,61
33,61
26,05
1226,05
7.3 Per diems
01.02.2010
03.02.2010
03.02.2010
98
165
19
G.J. COFFEE
AKYOL GIDA TURİZM
AKYOL GIDA TURİZM
27,50
10,00
14,00
23,11
8,40
11,76
03.02.2010
03.02.2010
03.02.2010
03.02.2010
176
179
53076
23629
AKYOL GIDA TURİZM
AKYOL GIDA TURİZM
FATOŞUN YERİ
TEPE OTEL
7.3 Per diems Total
15,00
32,00
1.080,00
3.030,40
4208,90
12,61
26,89
907,56
2546,55
3536,89
7.4 Rental of Facilities
03.02.2010
23628
TEPE OTEL
750,00
630,25
7.4 Rental of Facilities Total
7. COST OF WORKSHOP(S)/ TRAINING COURSE(S) TOTAL
750,00
7162,89
GRAND TOTAL
48328,54 40612,22
* The exchange rate is taken as 1,19 TL following the rate applied in the project application.
630,25
6019,24

see the project report here

Transkript

Benzer belgeler

Samsun Guide - ondokuz mayis university erasmus office

Evaluation of Empathetic Skills of Nurses Working in Oncology Units

Summary Report