The metaphors that represent secondary education teachers

Transkript

The metaphors that represent secondary education teachers
The metaphors that represent secondary education
teachers according to prospective teachers [Öǧretmen
adaylarina göre ortaöǧreti̇m öǧretmenleri̇ni̇ temsi̇l
eden metaforlar]
Oguz A.
Dumlupinar Üniversitesi, Eǧitim Fakültesi, Eǧitim Bilimleri Bölümü Egitim Programlari ve Ogretim
Anabilim Dali, Turkey
Abstract: It is important that prospective teachers acquire the modern behaviours of teaching profession.
Metaphors are made use of in teacher education to reveal the roles that the prospective teachers adopted and
their conceptions related to instruction. The aim of this study is to find out the prospective secondary
education teachers' conceptions related to secondary education teachers and how they see themselves as
teachers via the metaphors. The study group of the research is 187 undergraduate students being trained in
secondary education teacher training programs in 2005-2006 academic year, spring semester. Data was
gathered with a 26 item-questionaire composed of Likert type close-ended questions and also open-ended
questions. Depending on the findings, five metaphors that prospective teachers think to represent secondary
education teachers to some extent are; "leader, guide, researcher, compass and technical director", but there
aren't any metaphors that represent the secondary school teachers a lot or completely. One of the metaphors
that the prospective teachers believe to represent them a lot is "guide".
Author Keywords: Prospective teacher; Teacher education; Teacher metaphors
Year: 2009
Source title: Milli Egitim
Issue: 182
Page : 36-57
Link: Scorpus Link
Document Type: Article
Source: Scopus
Authors with affiliations:
1. Oǧuz, A., Dumlupinar Üniversitesi, Eǧitim Fakültesi, Eǧitim Bilimleri Bölümü Egitim Programlari ve Ogretim Anabilim Dali,
Turkey
References:
1.
Balci, A., Öǧrenci, Öǧretmen ve Velilerin Okul Kavramlaşti{dotless}rmalari{dotless}: Okul'un Metaforik Bir Analizi. X
(2001) Ulusal Eǧitim Bilimleri Sempozyumu.Cilt: III, pp. 130-135. , Bolu: Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi
Yayi{dotless}nlari{dotless}
2.
Başar, H., (2004) Si{dotless}ni{dotless}f Yönetimi, , Ankara: Ani{dotless} Yayi{dotless}nci{dotless}li{dotless}k
3.
Brooks, J.G., Ve Brooks, M.G., (1999) In Search of Understanding The Case For Constructivist Classrooms, , Alexandria,
Virginia USA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
4.
Büyüköztürk, Ş., (2005) Sosyal Bilimleriçin Ve ri Analizi El Kitabi{dotless}: İstatistik, Araşti{dotless}rma Deseni SPSS
Uygulamalari{dotless} ve Yorum, , (5. Basi{dotless}m). Ankara: Pegem A Yayi{dotless}nci{dotless}li{dotless}k
5.
Can, N., Si{dotless}ni{dotless}fta Bir Lider Olarak Öǧretmen (2004) Si{dotless}ni{dotless}f Yönetimi, pp. 127-139. ,
Ankara: Pegem A Yayi{dotless}nci{dotless}li{dotless}k (Editörler: Mehmet Şişman ve Selahattin Turan)
6.
Carlson, T.B., Using Metaphors to Enhance Reflectiveness Among Preservice Teachers (2001) Journal of Physical
Education, pp. 49-53. , http://proquest.umi.com, Recreation & Dance. 72, 1
7.
ProQuest Education Journals, (Erişim: 07.06.2005)
8.
Cerit, Y., Öǧrenci, Öǧretmen ve Yöneticilerin Okul Kavrami{dotless}yla İlgili Metaforlara İlişkin Görüşleri (2006) Kuram
ve Uygulamada Eǧitim Bilimleri, 6 (3), pp. 669-699
9.
Chen, D.D., A Classification System for Metaphors About Teaching (2003) Journal of Physical Education, Recreation &
Dance, 74 (2), pp. 24-31. , http://proquest.umi.com, (Erişim: 08. 08. 2005)
10. Cochran-Simit, M., Constructing Outcomes in Teacher Education: Policy, Practice and Pitfalls (2001) Education Policy
Analysis Archives, 9, p. 11. , 1068-2341
11. Demirel, Ö., (2005) Kuramdan Uygulamaya Eǧitimde Program Geliştirme, , (Yedinci Basi{dotless}m) Ankara: Pegem A
Yayi{dotless}nci{dotless}li{dotless}k
12. Goldstein, L.S., Becoming a Teacher and a Hero's Journey: Using Metaphor in Preservice Teacher Education (2005) Teacher
Education Quarterly, 32 (1), pp. 7-25. , http://proquest.umi.com, (Erişim: 08. 08. 2005)
13. Lakoff, G., Ve Johnson, M., (İngilizce'si 1980) (2005) Metaforlar Hayat Anlam ve Dil (Metaphors We Live By)., , (Çeviren:
Gökhan Yavuz Demir) Chicago, IL: The Universitiy of Chicago Press
14. Mahlios, M., Ve Maxson, M., Metaphors as Structures for Elemantary and Secondary Preservice Teachers' Thinking (1998)
International Journal of Educational Research, 29, pp. ss.227-ss.240
15. Marshall, H.H., Metaphoras an Instructional Tool in Encouranging Student Teacher Reflection (2001) Theory into Practice,
29 (2), pp. 128-132. , http://proquest.umi.com, (Erişim: 08. 08. 2005)
16. Oǧuz, A., Öǧretmen Eǧitim Programlari{dotless}nda Metafor Kullanma (2005) XIV. Ulusal Eǧitim Bilimleri Kongresi, pp.
ss.582-ss.588. , Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eǧitim Fakültesi, DENİZLİ, Kongre Kitabi{dotless} Cilt 1, (Editör: Hüseyin
Ki{dotless}ran)
17. Özden, Y., (2000) Eǧitimde Dönüşüm: Eǧitimde Yeni Deǧerler, , (Üçüncü Basi{dotless}m) Ankara: Pegem A
Yayi{dotless}nci{dotless}li{dotless}k
18. Perry, C., Ve Cooper, M., Metaphors are Good Mirrors: Reflecting on Change for Teacher Educators (2001) Reflective
Practice, 2 (1), pp. ss41-ss52. , http://web14.epnet.com, (Erişim: 08.08.2005)
19. Saban, A., Giriş Düzeyindeki Si{dotless}ni{dotless}f Öǧretmeni Adaylari{dotless}ni{dotless}n "Öǧretmen"
Kavrami{dotless}na İlişkin İleri Sürdükleri Metaforlar (2004) Türk Eǧitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 22, pp. 131-155
20. Saban, A., A Turkish Profile of Prospective elementary School Teachers and Their Views of Teaching (2003) Teaching and
Teacher Education, 19, pp. 829-846. , http://www.sciencedirect.com, (Erişim: 11. 05.2005)
21. S a b a n ,
A.,
Si{dotless}ni{dotless}f
Öǧretmeni
Adaylari{dotless}ni{dotless}n
En
Çok
Hati{dotless}rladi{dotless}klari{dotless} ve En Çok Tercih Ettikleri İlkokul Metaforlari{dotless} (2002) Eǧitim Bilimleri ve
Uygulama, 1 (2), pp. ss.211-ss.223
22. Saban, A., Koçbeker, B.N., Ve Saban, A., Öǧretmen Adaylari{dotless}ni{dotless}n Öǧretmen Kavrami{dotless}na İlişkin
Sahip Olduklari{dotless} Metaforlar (2005) XIV. Ulusal Eǧitim Bilimleri Kongresi, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eǧitim
Fakültesi, pp. 540-546. , 28-30 Eylül 2005, DENİZLİ. Kongre Kitabi{dotless} Cilt 1 (Editör: Hüseyin Ki{dotless}ran)
23. Savran, A., Çakiroǧlu, J., Tekkaya, C., Yansi{dotless}ti{dotless}ci{dotless} Öǧretmen Eǧitimi: Bir Eylem
Araşti{dotless}rmasi{dotless} (2005) XIV. Ulusal Eǧitim Bilimleri Kongresi, pp. 561-656. , Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eǧitim
Fakültesi, 28-30 Eylül 2005, DENİZLİ. Kongre Kitabi{dotless} Cilt 1, (Editör: Hüseyin Ki{dotless}ran)
24. Senemoǧlu, N., (2007) Gelişim Öǧrenme ve Öǧretim: Kuramdan Uygulamaya, , Düzenlenmi Yeni Basi{dotless}m. Ankara:
Gönül Yayi{dotless}nci{dotless}li{dotless}k
25. Sünbül, A.M., Bir Meslek Olarak Öǧretmenlik (2002) Öǧretmenlik Mesleǧine Giriş, pp. ss.243-ss.278. , (EditörÖzcan
Demirel) Ankara: Pegem A Yayi{dotless}nci{dotless}li{dotless}k
26. Tobin, K., Changing Metaphors and Beliefs: A Master Switch for Teaching? (2001) Theory into Practice, 29 (2), pp. ss.122ss.127
27. Vandeboncoeur, J.A., Ve Torres, M.N., Constructing and Reconstructing Teaching Roles: a Focus on Generative Metaphors
an Dichotomies (2003) Discourse: Studies in the Culturel Politics of Education, 24 (1), pp. 87-103. , http://web14.epnet.com,
(Erişim: 27.04.2005)
28. Yaşar, Ş., Yapi{dotless}salci{dotless} Kuram ve Öǧrenme-Öǧretme Süreci (1998) VII. Ulusal Eǧitim Bilimleri Kongresi
Bildiriler., pp. ss.695-ss.699. , 9-11 Eylül 1998, Cilt 1, Konya Selçuk Üniversitesi
29. Yildirim, A., ve Şimşek, H., (1999) Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araşti{dotless}rma Yöntemleri, , Ankara: Seçkin
Yayi{dotless}nci{dotless}li{dotless}k

Benzer belgeler

The effectiveness of a Secondary Teacher Education Graduate

The effectiveness of a Secondary Teacher Education Graduate program does not reflect the innovations in teaching and the changes in secondary education. The participants mainly suggested administrative solutions for the program. © 2010 Eǧitim Danişmanliǧi v...

Detaylı